Log in | Sign up | Contact us | Cancel my account | Get help

Essay Archives View as a list

13 September 2006: Crosswalk America Arrives in Washington, DC

It began on April 16, 2006, following a sunrise service in Phoenix, Arizona. It ended on September 3, 2006, at a celebration in the Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington, DC. Between those two dates, more than five million steps were taken, at least three pairs of shoes per person were worn out, over 2,500 …

Read More…

Q & A:

Dr. Cato in his excellent essay several months ago, suggested

that Christians should take a position on the morally appropriate

allocation of medical resources in the event of a flu pandemic.

I believe that the likely allocation pattern can be easily

deduced from current public policy on health care: most resources

will go to the elderly through the Medicare program and the

children will be left out. This is misguided and immoral:

children and the parents who provided for them should receive the

highest priority. Medicare recipients like myself (age 69) are

grateful for the Medicare benefit, but the future of our society

does not depend much on 69 year-olds. It depends very much on

those who are now children. Even in the "best of times" (i.e. no

flu pandemic) millions of children go without routine

immunizations because their parents are poor, but too "rich" for

Medicaid. I propose that the children, rich and poor alike, have

what Dr. Cato calls ".the most value to (society)." I am a member

of a small Episcopal parish in Kansas and I have already written

my Congressional delegation about my views. You seem to suggest

that we should do more to influence (i.e. change) public policy.

But how?

Read the Answer...

6 September 2006: Miracles in the Bible, Part II

There is a great desire among religious people for quick answers to complex issues. “What is the meaning of prayer? What do you believe about life after death? Do you believe in Miracles?” These are questions that I am often asked when giving lectures, where I am limited to only a few minutes for each …

Read More…

Q & A:

First of all, let me say that, if I can still consider myself a

Christian, it is thanks to you and your work. As a former

Catholic, I can only contrast your message of the God of Love

with the God of Judgment that we find in virtually all the modern

popes with the (miraculous?) exception of John XXIII. But I

sometimes find myself wondering: why not just do as I have done

and identify oneself primarily as a Buddhist? The Buddha isn't

God, he's just another human being who, like Jesus, pointed the

way for his fellow humans to find peace and liberation from

suffering. Scholars like Marcus Borg have indicated the

similarities between Jesus and the Buddha; and indeed, great and

inspiring people like Thich Nhat Hahn have indicated this in

their work as well.

Both Jesus and the Buddha point to the transforming power of

love/compassion that there is to be found in all of us. I think

that the traditional teachings on what has happened to Jesus

(sitting at the right hand of God) and the Buddha (becoming one

with the universe) are basically the same myths trying to capture

something that, so far, lies beyond the experience of most of us.

(Similarly, on a recent trip to Vietnam, I was struck by the

function that the bodhissatva of compassion Quan Am plays in

Vietnamese Buddhism - much the role of the Virgin Mary has in

Catholicism.) Part of me suspects that the reason why such

writers as you and Thich Nhat Hahn do NOT advocate Westerners

becoming Buddhists is because we have been raised in a culture

that, if it supports any spirituality, does so from a Christian


But for some of us, it is precisely the distortion of these

cultural aspects of the Christian message that makes it so hard

to see Jesus without what I call "spiritual interference." For

Catholics such as myself, it might be the spectre of the church

cover-ups of the abuse of so many children by its shepherds, or

the appalling cost wrought by Paul VI with his encyclical on

birth control. Maybe it is the reluctance of bishops to permit

women to even serve as altar girls, let alone priests and

bishops. Maybe some members of the Church Alumni Club have been

so worn out trying to see Jesus past the figures of Pat Robertson

and Jerry Falwell that they have forgotten how God's power shines

through such contemporary figures as Martin Luther King, William

Sloane Coffin, John Dear, Daniel Berrigan, Joan Chittester and

yourself. Am I on to something here? Basically my question is,

since the Church is so in need of reform, and since conservative

power is so entrenched, why not become a Buddhist? Or is there

really a difference I am missing?

Read the Answer...

30 August 2006: Did Jesus Really Perform Miracles?

For many people the title of this column represents a silly question. The pages of the gospels are filled with stories of supernatural happenings associated with Jesus. Most people, however, have very little sense of the actual content or meaning of these miracle accounts or how differently they are portrayed in each gospel. Some of …

Read More…

Q & A:

Thank you for this thorough treatment of such an

important topic in your column, "Born Gay." I was in

conversation with my United Methodist pastor recently about this

very issue and the comments of a preacher who had been invited to

speak to our church, comments upholding his outdated and

prejudiced views. My pastor said that his own position was that

although some say homosexuality was somehow biological/genetic,

it was the same as saying that alcoholism was genetically caused.

In other words, one may have the genetic predisposition for the

condition but one chooses how they respond to it. I realized

that we are on different planets. My predicament is whether to

stay with this church I have been a member of for 30 years, and

among people I love and continue to do the work I do with a Grief

Support Group, stay with my son and grandchildren or leave. More

and more I am part of the church alumni and even though I have

stayed I have lost a lot of joy in my experience there.

Read the Answer...

22 August 2006: Understanding Religious Anger

One of the things that always surprises me is the level of anger, often expressed in acts of overt rudeness, which seems to mark religious people. It appears so often that I have almost come to expect it, or at the very least not to be surprised by it. A recent episode simply made the …

Read More…

Q & A:

I've wondered for a while about the definition of

theism and its implications. There seem to be three central

points you use most often. The God of theism is 1) external, 2)

supernatural, 3) intervenes in human lives. Does this statement

imply that God is the opposite of these three things?

Much of what you write suggests that this is clearly

true of point 3. You present God as not intervening and not

capable of intervening. The opposite of point 2 would seem to be

that God is natural. Is this a correct assumption and, if so,

how do you see God as manifest in the natural world? The

opposite of point 1 would seem to be that God is internal.

I'm very aware that I might be reading too much into

your words but the sense I get is that you suggest that God is

internal to human experience. This seems to fit with some modern

brain research that suggests that human beings are "hard-wired"

to believe in some higher power and to worship it. This research

suggests that belief in God is a natural part of being human

rather than a social construct imposed from without.

Is this the non-theistic understanding of God? Internal, natural

(thought not manifest outside of human consciousness) and unable

to intervene in the world (except perhaps through God's effects

on the consciousness of each believer?

Read the Answer...

16 August 2006: Questions and Answers

A note to my readers: Dear Friends: Your letters come in such numbers that if I responded to each one I would need a full time staff. I can assure you that every one of them is read and I try to pick the most interesting ones for publication. Using only one each week, however, …

Read More…

9 August 2006: The Ambivalent Church

There is something fundamentally flawed about institutional Christianity today. I see it in two distinct places. It was clearly present when I listened to ecclesiastical figures talk about the election of a female bishop to be primate of the Episcopal Church in the USA. The other is found both in the tone and content of …

Read More…

Q & A:

Recognizing that the Bible consists of many books by

many authors over a 1,000 year period of time, and assuming that

no major additions to the Bible have been attempted since the

King James Version was published 400 years ago or so, and further

noting that a stupendous amount of information about changes in

the secular world, which seem to be accelerating, are now before

us do you think a major addition, such as another "testament" or

"New Testament No. 2" or an authorized supplement to the Bible

(other than modern era re-translations that have been printed

even in the 20th century, and which appear to be entirely

self-serving) is in order? If so, might such an addition help

theologians reduce the irrelevance of their teachings and answer

many of the questions raised by your latest book, "The Sins of


If so, who could write it, who could publish it, and

who could be induced to read it? Who, of all our religious

leaders now in positions of power would be in support of such a

development and could be induced to accept it inasmuch as,

surely, they would see it as a threat to their power? It might

be the only way to make religion relevant again as it once was in

ancient times, in my opinion. What do you think?

Read the Answer...

2 August 2006: Cowboy Diplomacy in a Frightening World

In one of its regular features The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer on PBS recently showed the pictures of 16 more American military personnel who had recently lost their lives in Iraq. I watched with wrenching emotions. Each photograph represented the broken dreams of a now shattered family. These photographs were not just of a soldier …

Read More…

Q & A:

In your answer of May 10, 2006, you wrote, "I see Christianity at

its heart as deeply humanistic. The core doctrines of the

Christian faith suggest that God is revealed through a human

life...so I see secular humanism as the residual remains of

Christianity once the supernatural elements have been removed."

In the next paragraph, you say you do not think "the

supernatural understanding of God is essential to Christianity."

In your answer of May 3, 2006, you reject "the interpretation of

Jesus' death as a sacrifice required by God to overcome the sins

of the world" as making God "barbaric" and "Jesus the victim of a

sadistic deity." This "deeply violates the essential note of the

Gospel, which is that God is love calling us to love" and is not

"found in the pious but destructive phrase, 'Jesus died for my


My question is: If Jesus did not die on the cross to atone for

humanity's sins, why did he have to die to bring us the message

that "God is love, calling us to love"?

Read the Answer...

26 July 2006: Emily Jane Failla: A Special Life

The community of St. Peter’s Church in Morristown, New Jersey, where my wife and I worship, gathered this week to celebrate the life of Emily Jane Failla and to bid her farewell. Most of my readers will not know Emily but she illustrates so many of the realities that plague both our humanity and our …

Read More…

Q & A:

Why not refer readers both Christian/Church alumni/and

non-Christian readers to the recent publication of James Robinson's

"The Gospel of Jesus." It is a very well written account of how

the New Testament came to be but is most effective in isolating

the meat of the coco, his account of Jesus' own gospel as opposed

to that of Paul and Rome. He paints a picture of what I truly

believe the man Jesus was about that can only be described as

"awesome!" But mostly he points me, a retired minister, to the

tremendously exciting truth I could have been preaching...but

sadly, I just didn't know.

Read the Answer...

19 July 2006: Free to Believe: A Voice from the United Reformed Church of England

Recently, while on a lecture tour of England, I was the keynote speaker at a national conference of the United Reformed Church of England. This body, the result of a merger within Protestantism during the last century between English Presbyterians and English Congregationalists, serves as leaven in the lump of English religious life. It has …

Read More…

Q & A:

I first encountered your religious philosophy and/or beliefs

watching your lecture on University of California Television

about one year ago. I have read several of your books and find

your thoughts to be the best and most sensible in understanding

the Christian faith. However, about three to four years ago I

made the decision to become an atheist based on reading two books

by John A. Henderson, "God.com" and "Fear, Faith, Fact and


I kept this secret from my wife and even told her that your views

made the most sense to me and your religious philosophy gave me

hope that there might even be a Higher Power. However, about

three months ago, I read Sam Harris - "The End of Faith" and

since that time have felt very comfortable with being an atheist.

Moreover, I have taken several college level audio CD courses in

religion and philosophy, read several books by Elaine Pagels,

studied the findings of the Jesus Seminar, studied several essays

and books by Thomas Sheehan, Rudolph Bultmann and Robert Funk.

None of which has changed my mind.

The point I am trying to get to is: My wife has

always been a Born Again Christian and early in our marriage of

25 years, we attended the churches of her faith and those of my

original faith - Lutheran. Both of my parents are Lutheran. The

other night after a very pleasant evening out, we got into a

discussion about going to church again and I told her I was an

atheist. She almost made me stop the car and let her get out

because she would not be yoked to a non-believer. We are still

together and have tried to talk through this but she is having

great difficulty in accepting my decision. We are scheduled to

see a marriage counselor that we both liked when we had some

problems in our marriage about 10-15 years ago at her suggestion

and my total agreement.

Is there any insight or advice you might provide to

help us work through this situation? I do not want to be

divorced much less separated. Fortunately, we do not have any

children. But I am deeply alarmed that she might consider

separation because I am not a Christian. I did ask her what if I

had chosen Islam, Jewish or even a Taoist belief what would she

have done. She said, "Well, at least you would believe in


Read the Answer...

12 July 2006: On Dating the New Testament

A letter from one of my Internet readers, Max Rippeto, asked how New Testament scholars went about the task of dating the books of the New Testament. It was such a good question and touched so many issues that others among my readers raise, that I decided to base my entire column this week on …

Read More…

Q & A:

I receive your weekly newsletter and look forward to

it very much. I have read several of your books also and agree

with most of your insights and concepts. I also watched your

interview with Geraldine Doogue on the Australian Broadcasting

Corporation Television Station when you were out several years


The question is this: You say that you still spend a

lot of time praying but to whom do you pray? "The Ground of

Being" as you refer to God seems very impersonal and I find it

difficult to let go of the "father" image I was raised with in an

evangelical church in the 60's. How does a "Ground of Being"

actually care about me and my family? Intellectually I know that

God really couldn't care less about insignificant me here on

planet Earth (example Tsunami victims, hurricane victims,

famines, fires, etc.) yet I WANT to believe that SOMETHING or

SOMEONE does - or else what is the point of being born,

struggling through a crappy life and then dying and going to

nothing? I find I struggle with "what is the point of it all" on

a daily basis. I know that you say living life to the fullest is

what it's all about - but if there's no point to it all then why

bother caring about anything and living life to the fullest when

it is all for nothing in the end? I know life is for living in

the now - but I can't enjoy it if I know there's nothing at the

end of it and all my relatives that I love so much are going

nowhere and I will never see them again. It is all too sad. The

childish part of me still wants "someone" in authority to care

about me and my family. I guess that I really do still want my

God to care about me and "watch out" for me but I know wanting

God to care is childish rubbish and all the concepts that go

along with traditional Christianity.

Can you help me with some of these questions -

especially to whom do you pray and do you ask for help and love

from him/it?

Read the Answer...

In Need of a Good Word?

We encourage you to show your support for positive and progressive Christian views by becoming a part of Bishop Spong's growing online community. You'll receive a new column each week on topics in social justice and spirituality that matter most.

Join the Movement

Free Q&A Email

Sign up for Bishop Spong's FREE weekly Q&A email.

Browse by Date

Browse our monthly archives:

Connect on Facebook