Log in | Sign up | Contact us | Cancel my account | Get help

Essay Archives View as a list

5 July 2006: Katharine Jefferts Schori – New Primate of the Episcopal Church

Dear Friends, The English newspapers made it a front page story. English ecclesiastical figures from the Archbishop of Canterbury down to a bigoted pressure group called Forward in Faith, spoke ominously and critically of the problem this event would create and the insensitivity of the American Church in not taking their concerns and prejudices into …

Read More…

Q & A:

I have just read your column entitled, "Jesus for the

Non-Religious." I guess I am left wondering why if one can strip

away most if not all the gospel details of his life, he can

continue to exist in history. Why not take the view that

Canadian humanist historian Early Doherty takes that Christianity

grew in part out of the Greco-Roman world being impressed by the

Hebrew scriptures and later the movement demanded a leader and

midrash provided by the Hebrew cultish groups in Palestine

provided this. (I hope I am doing justice to Professor Doherty).

Read the Answer...

28 June 2006: A Living Watershed

Dear Friends, This week I want to share with you a rare account of a Protestant church wrestling concretely with whether or not to call an openly gay man to be their minister. The account was written by a friend of mine named Chris Avis, a member of the United Reformed Church of England, who …

Read More…

Q & A:

Your recent e-mail

article, "Jesus for the Non-Religious, Part I," was very

interesting. I have always maintained doubts about the

historicity of Jesus, in particular, how the stories that

comprise the New Testament evolved into the texts as we know them

today in the Bible. In your very fine article, you commented that

the followers most likely used the synagogue to transmit the

story of Jesus. You said in your column that the synagogue

"became the setting in which his followers told stories about

Jesus, recalled the sayings and parables of Jesus and remembered

and shared the developing Jesus tradition. In this fashion, over

the years, the Hebrew Scriptures were wrapped around Jesus and

through them Jesus was interpreted. The content of the memory of

Jesus was thus organized by the liturgy of the synagogue. To

recognize this connection becomes a major breakthrough into the

oral period of Christian history."

Here is my question: wouldn't the Jews, during the time following

the death of Jesus (30 C.E. - 70 C.E.) have rejected his status

as "the messiah," thus discounting Jesus as a messenger from God?

It would seem to me that rather than use the synagogue to

discuss, and possibly embellish his life; the Jews would not

attribute any divine nature to Jesus, thus rejecting him

entirely. I say this because it is my understanding that during

the time of Jesus; the Jews were anticipating a messiah. Prior

to Jesus' death, he was interrogated by Caiaphas, the elder of

the Sanhedrin (John 18:12-33). Caiaphas determined that Jesus

was not the messiah. Wouldn't that suffice to dismiss Jesus and

all accounts of his life as worthy of further discussion in the

synagogues? It is my opinion that the Jews would not have

revered him as the one whom the Old Testament prophesied.

Therefore, I surmise that stories about Jesus would more likely

have originated as folklore among the gentiles.

Read the Answer...

21 June 2006: Mr. Bush: A Public Embarrassment

I find myself deeply embarrassed today by the President of the United States. It is a new feeling. I do not pretend to be a Bush fan. I have many disagreements with him on many issues. I do not share or appreciate his political philosophy. I count myself as part of the loyal opposition, and …

Read More…

Q & A:

Is it possible that Jesus was inferring that some

people were born gay in Matthew 19:12? It reads, "For

there are different reasons why men cannot marry: some

because they are born that way, others, because men

made them that way and others do not marry for the

sake of the Kingdom of Heaven."

Read the Answer...

14 June 2006: A Life Well Lived

Reading obituaries is a remarkably insightful pastime. Each of us does it more and more as we grow older. The obituary writer obviously cannot recall all the twists and turns of a single life. Indeed, for the world to take note of a particular death in the obituary pages of a major newspaper at all, …

Read More…

Q & A:

Besides enjoying your audiotapes from the Westar

Institute, I am enjoying the audiotapes from Bart

Ehrman from The Teaching Company. This company also

offers tapes from a man named Luke Timothy Johnson.

On your audiotapes of the resurrection, you mention

several times a Luke Timothy Johnson who has been

critical of your ministry. From your description of

him and their description of him, it sounds like they

are the same person. My question is are they the same

person? If so, would you recommend me investing in

purchasing his tapes?

Read the Answer...

7 June 2006: The Columbus, Ohio, Episcopal Battlefield

I hope my readers will pardon me for spending a second week dealing with issues within my own Episcopal Church. I do not do so out of some presumed hubris that makes me think that this small denomination of less than 2,000,000 members in the United States is deserving of special attention. I do it …

Read More…

Q & A:

If we accept the fact that Jesus was a man with a

beautiful and powerful teaching and not a Savior,

Messiah or the Christ, is it not time to make the

shift away from calling ourselves Christian? Perhaps

Jesuian or Jesuist, something more affirming of Jesus

the man and not as Christ and away from the Almighty

Father God toward what you describe as a non-theist

ground of being? As I move enthusiastically and

rapidly to this new and wonderful horizon that you and

a growing number of others point toward, I find I can

not call myself Christian or even a liberal one any

longer. Isn't it time to differentiate this new

religious sense with a new name that affirms the new

direction and the new way of being in the world?

Read the Answer...

31 May 2006: The California Episcopal Election

The headline in the Washington Post said: “Episcopalians Reject Gay Hopefuls.” It was the typical hype of the media. The story went on to say that the Diocese of California (the San Francisco area) had elected Mark H. Andrus, the Suffragan bishop of Alabama, to be the Bishop of California. They described him, interestingly enough, …

Read More…

Q & A:

Just read your latest mailing with great delight but

sadly must comment that there are too many educated

people who are still ignorant about the origins of

homosexuality including - sadly - many members of my

medical community. I recently went to a church in New

Mexico where the pastor was a physician as were

several "high rolling" members, who made it quickly

clear to me that they were a branch of the (Episcopal)

church that separated from those who let homosexuals

in. I was both disgusted and amused because, in

looking round me, there were numerous homosexuals in

the church group. As a psychiatrist, I am probably

more aware of this than the "ordinary" member. Had I

been more than visiting, I probably would have made a

loud noise about the whole thing as I have in other

churches. I applaud you for your continuing efforts

to bring reason to society about this issue as many

others of us also do in our own ways.

Read the Answer...

24 May 2006: On Viewing “The Da Vinci Code”

Separating fact from fantasy is not always easy. This is especially so when the two are skillfully woven together by a very competent novelist named Dan Brown and then projected onto the screen by one of Hollywood’s premier directors, Ron Howard. When this combination of fact and fantasy is then woven around Christianity’s origins and …

Read More…

Q & A:

I have just been fired as a Jr. Hi Sunday School

teacher at the First Presbyterian Church in Oak Ridge,

TN, because I would not represent the Bible as perfect

and infallible to the children. I have lots of proof

to the contrary: I have many versions of the Bible on

my hard drive and can search any of them for any word

or phrase in a fraction of a second. It is possible

that I have found ugly and evil content of which you

are unaware. I would be pleased to send you a list of

what I have found. Apparently "The Sins of the

Scripture: Exposing the Bible's Texts of Hate to

Reveal the God of Love" is exactly what I need. I

intend to procure a copy soon.

Read the Answer...

17 May 2006: Easter Imagined and Recreated

As I mentioned last week my lifetime study of the five Easter narratives in the New Testament (I Corinthians 15:1-58, Mark 16:1-8, Matthew 28, Luke 24 and John 20, 21, listed in their historical time order) has led me to establish four clues through which I measure the authenticity of each resurrection account. I repeat …

Read More…

Q & A:

In one of your recent Questions & Answers a woman

asked about her friend saying "Go to God" for the

ethics on homosexuality and you interpreted this as

"go to the Bible." You asked her to question the Old

Testament principles that, as you point out, include

not only homicidal homophobia but also ruthless

misogyny and regulated slavery. Fair enough, but one

can also point to God's promise that no one who seeks

him is excluded and his refutation of the use of laws

to oppress humans. But on the point of "Go to God,"

may I share that as a gay teenage Christian (thirty

years ago), I had questions arising from the

condemnation others put on my own romantic attraction.

I didn't go the Bible for answers. I went to God in

my heart. I then knew deeply that my Creator neither

hates me nor made me to be hateful nor hated and that

my profound romantic love for a certain guy at school,

a homosexual love if you like, was a divine gift. It

may be that for many people if we "go to God" in our

own hearts, we may have some feelings indicating

whether we should buy into hateful divisive prejudices

or find it in ourselves to love our neighbors as


Read the Answer...

10 May 2006: Easter Explained

Last week I shared with my readers the time in my life when I devoted a semester at Cambridge University to making sense, at least for me, out of the meaning of Easter. I could no longer be bound by the literal texts of the Bible for they described the resurrection of Jesus in fanciful …

Read More…

Q & A:

In your answer to the humanist question, you seem to

suggest by your final quotes that secular humanism is

"descended" from Christianity. I don't know if that

indeed is what you intended. It seems to me, however,

that secular, humanist values might parallel those of

other religions. Might the parallels with Jesus"

teaching that you correctly cite instead be a


Read the Answer...

3 May 2006: Easter Revisited

The biblical narratives purporting to tell the story of Easter have always held a particular fascination for me. As early as the summer of 1959 I gave a series of lectures on the gospel accounts of the resurrection at the Kanuga Conference Center in Hendersonville, North Carolina. From that starting point until today my interest …

Read More…

Q & A:

How do you personally, and Christian doctrine in

particular, reconcile the contradiction of that

biblical prohibition against child sacrifice with the

claim that "God sacrificed his child" in explaining

the horrific death of Jesus? It seems to me that

rather than the "sacrifice of Jesus" being of benefit

to Christians, it serves more to threaten them with

death and/or eternal punishment if they are not

obedient to the wishes and decrees of the Church.

Read the Answer...

In Need of a Good Word?

We encourage you to show your support for positive and progressive Christian views by becoming a part of Bishop Spong's growing online community. You'll receive a new column each week on topics in social justice and spirituality that matter most.

Join the Movement

Free Q&A Email

Sign up for Bishop Spong's FREE weekly Q&A email.

Browse by Date

Browse our monthly archives:

Connect on Facebook